The Risk of Reinfection or Primary Hepatitis E Virus Infection at a Liver Transplant Center in Brazil: An Observational Cohort Study.

The hepatitis E virus is a major etiological agent of chronic hepatitis in immunosuppressed individuals. Seroprevalence in the liver transplantation setting varies according to the seroprevalence of the general population in different countries. This was a prospective cohort study of liver transplant recipients in southeastern Brazil. Recipients were systematically followed for one year, with the objective of determining the prevalence, incidence, and natural history of HEV infection in this population. We included 107 liver transplant recipients and 83 deceased donors. Positivity for anti-HEV IgG was detected in 10.2% of the recipients and in 9.7% of the donors. None of the patients tested positive for HEV RNA at baseline or during follow-up. There were no episodes of reactivation or seroconversion, even in cases of serological donor-recipient mismatch or in recipients with acute hepatitis. Acute and chronic HEV infections seem to be rare events in the region studied. That could be attributable to social, economic, and environmental factors. Our data indicate that, among liver transplant recipients, hepatitis E should be investigated only when there are elevated levels of transaminases with no defined cause, as part of the differential diagnosis of seronegative hepatitis after transplantation.

Monitoring for HHV-6 infection after renal transplantation: evaluation of risk factors for sustained viral replication.

BACKGROUND: Human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) is known to reactivate after renal transplantation and has been associated with several clinical manifestations. Risk factors for sustained viral replication, however, remain unclear. METHODS: Thirty consecutive kidney transplant patients were prospectively followed for HHV-6 replication between February 2007 and February 2008. Plasma samples for DNA detection were collected from the donor and the recipient before transplantation and from the recipient weekly for the first 2 months after transplantation and then every 2 weeks for 2 additional months. HHV-6 active infection was defined as detection of viral DNA in plasma, by polymerase chain reaction, in at least two consecutive samples over an interval of at least 1 week. RESULTS: Active viral infection was detected in 25% of the recipients before transplantation and 27% (8 of 30) of the patients after transplantation. The mean time to onset of viral replication was 28.1 days after transplantation and 7 of 8 (87.5%) were asymptomatic. Risk factors associated with active HHV-6 infection were receiving an organ from a living donor (P=0.028), recipients with IgM antibodies detected before transplantation (P=0.005), and pretransplantation recipient HHV-6 viral load more than 10,000 copies/mL plasma (P=0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Active HHV-6 infection occurs early after renal transplantation and is mostly asymptomatic. Donor or recipient infection may occur at the time of transplantation and are related to higher rates of posttransplantation infections.

Bloodstream infection after kidney transplantation: epidemiology, microbiology, associated risk factors, and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infection (BSI) is associated with both relevant morbidity and mortality rates after kidney transplantation. METHODS: From January 1, 2000 to January 31, 2006, all episodes of BSI were retrospectively assessed through the review of medical records in two tertiary teaching Hospitals in Sao Paulo, Brazil, where 3308 transplant procedures were performed during this period. Contaminants and polymicrobial infections were excluded. The main objectives of the study were to describe clinical and microbiologic aspects of BSI, as well as risk factors for both BSI and mortality from these infections in kidney transplant patients. RESULTS: BSI was detected in 185 patients, with onset after a median of 235 days after transplantation; 62% occurred after 6 months. The primary source of infection was the urinary tract in 37.8%. The most prevalent pathogen overall was Escherichia coli (30.3%). Risk factors for early acquired BSI (first 6 months after transplantation) were acute rejection, ureteric stent placement, and receiving an organ from a deceased donor. For late BSI (after 6 months), associated risk factors were acute rejection, Charlson Comorbidity Score more than or equal to 3, and receiving an organ from a deceased donor. Risk factors related to 30-day mortality were Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II Score more than or equal to 20, shock, and respiratory failure. CONCLUSIONS: BSI is most frequently a consequence of urinary tract infection, with a high prevalence of gram-negative bacilli. Severity of disease was the main determinant of 30-day mortality after BSI, and based on the knowledge of risk factors, some interventions are suggested for reducing the rate of BSI after transplantation.

Analysis of vancomycin use and associated risk factors in a university teaching hospital: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin use is considered inappropriate in most hospitals. A particular concern is the recent emergence of S. aureus with decreased susceptibility to vancomycin, making it important to reduce overall exposure to vancomycin to minimize the incidence of VRE (vancomycin-resistant enterococci). The aim of this work was to analyze the use of vancomycin and the risk factors associated with inappropriate treatment. METHODS: A prospective survey was conducted on all patients receiving vancomycin between 1st March 2002 and 30th September 2002 in a university-school hospital. Appropriateness of vancomycin use was assessed, according to the criteria established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), at two time points: first, at the beginning of therapy, and second, continuing after 72 hours. RESULTS: A total of 557 patients received vancomycin. Three hundred seventy-four (67.1%) were under 60 years old, 374 (67.1%) had prolonged stays (>two weeks) in hospital, and 455 (81.7%) were in the intensive care unit (ICU). Two hundred sixty-three patients (47.2%) had some invasive device. In 324 (58.2%) patients the duration of vancomycin treatment was up to two weeks. Vancomycin was inappropriately used in 65.7% during the first 24 hours and in 67% at the 72 hours point according to CDC criteria 4. The inappropriateness of vancomycin use during the first 24 hours was related to: patients aged less than 60 (OR 1.7; CI 95% 1.1-2.5), non-ICU patients (OR 1.5; CI 95% 1.0-2.4) and patients without neutropenia (OR 7.5; CI 95% 2.4-22.7). At 72 hours, the inappropriateness of vancomycin use was related to: patients aged less than 60 (OR 1.5; CI 95% 1.0-2.3), non-ICU patients (OR 1.7; CI 95% 1.1-2.7) and patients without neutropenia (OR 8.0; CI 95% 2.6-24.3). CONCLUSION: Vancomycin was abused. Patients aged less than 60, non-ICU patients and those who did not present neutropenia were the principal groups at risk of inappropriate use.